Republican Institutions 
    Henry George: Political
    Dangers (Chapter 2 of Social Problems,
1883) 
    
      [11] The rise in the United States of monstrous fortunes, the aggregation
        of enormous wealth in the hands of corporations, necessarily implies the loss
        by the people of governmental control. Democratic forms may be maintained,
        but there can be as much tyranny and misgovernment under democratic forms as
        any other — in fact, they lend themselves most readily to tyranny and
        misgovernment. Forms count for little. The Romans expelled their kings, and
        continued to abhor
        the very name of king. But under the name of Cæsars and Imperators, that
        at first meant no more than our "Boss," they crouched before tyrants
        more absolute than kings. We have already, under the popular name of "bosses," developed
        political Cæsars in municipalities and states. If this development continues,
        in time there will come a national boss. We are young but we are growing. The
        day may arrive when the "Boss of America" will be to the modern world
        what Cæsar was to the Roman world. This, at least, is certain: Democratic
        government in more than name can exist only where wealth is distributed with
        something like equality — where the great mass of citizens are personally
        free and independent, neither fettered by their poverty nor made subject by
        their wealth. There is, after all, some sense in a property qualification.
        The man who is dependent on a master for his living is not a free man. To give
        the suffrage to slaves is only to give votes to their owners. That universal
        suffrage may add to, instead of decreasing, the political power of wealth we
        see when mill-owners and mine operators vote their hands. The freedom to earn,
        without fear or favor, a comfortable living, ought to go with the freedom to
        vote. Thus alone can a sound basis for republican institutions be secured.        How can a man be said to have a country where he has no right to a square inch
        of soil; where he has nothing but his hands, and, urged by starvation, must
        bid against his fellows for the privilege of using them? When it comes to voting
        tramps, some principle has been carried to a ridiculous and dangerous extreme.
        I have known elections to be decided by the carting of paupers from the almshouse
        to the polls. But such decisions can scarcely be in the interest of good government. ... read the entire essay 
       
      
      
     | 
    
      
        
          To
                share this page with  a friend: right click,  choose "send," and
              add your comments.  
            | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        Red
              links have not been visited; .  
              Green
          links are pages you've seen   | 
       
      
                   Essential Documents
                pertinent to this theme: 
          essential_documents  | 
       
      |