Good Government 
      Henry George: Political
    Dangers (Chapter 2 of Social Problems,
1883) 
      
                    [11] The rise in the United States of monstrous fortunes, the aggregation
                    of enormous wealth in the hands of corporations, necessarily implies the loss
                    by the people of governmental control. Democratic forms may be maintained,
                    but there can be as much tyranny and misgovernment under democratic forms as
                    any other — in fact, they lend themselves most readily to tyranny and
                    misgovernment. Forms count for little. The Romans expelled their kings, and
                    continued to abhor
                    the very name of king. But under the name of Cæsars and Imperators, that
                    at first meant no more than our "Boss," they crouched before tyrants
                    more absolute than kings. We have already, under the popular name of "bosses," developed
                    political Cæsars in municipalities and states. If this development continues,
                    in time there will come a national boss. We are young but we are growing. The
                    day may arrive when the "Boss of America" will be to the modern world
                    what Cæsar was to the Roman world. This, at least, is certain: Democratic
                    government in more than name can exist only where wealth is distributed with
                    something like equality — where the great mass of citizens are personally
                    free and independent, neither fettered by their poverty nor made subject by
                    their wealth. There is, after all, some sense in a property qualification.
                    The man who is dependent on a master for his living is not a free man. To give
                    the suffrage to slaves is only to give votes to their owners. That universal
                    suffrage may add to, instead of decreasing, the political power of wealth we
                    see when mill-owners and mine operators vote their hands. The freedom to earn,
                    without fear or favor, a comfortable living, ought to go with the freedom to
                    vote. Thus alone can a sound basis for republican institutions be secured.
                    How can a man be said to have a country where he has no right to a square inch
                    of soil; where he has nothing but his hands, and, urged by starvation, must
                    bid against his fellows for the privilege of using them? When it comes to voting
                    tramps, some principle has been carried to a ridiculous and dangerous extreme.
                    I have known elections to be decided by the carting of paupers from the almshouse
                    to the polls. But such decisions can scarcely be in the interest of good government. ... read the entire essay 
       
      
      
        
       | 
    
      
        
          To
                share this page with  a friend: right click,  choose "send," and
              add your comments.  
            | 
       
      
         | 
       
      
        Red
              links have not been visited; .  
              Green
          links are pages you've seen   | 
       
      
                   Essential Documents
                pertinent to this theme: 
          essential_documents  | 
       
      |